Calculate hidden work tax
Translate unplanned work, rework, incidents, and coordination into capacity and cost leakage.
What it's for
Unplanned work, rework, incidents and coordination don't show up on the roadmap, but they consume the same people. This converts them into the capacity and cost they are actually taking.
Substantiates hidden-tax and engineering-cost narratives without individual scoring.
What you give it
Inputs split into evidence read from your connected systems, calibration your team owns, and numerical controls that affect precision but never the result's meaning.
| Field | Type | Role | Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| available_hours | number > 0 | Your calibration | Yes |
| coordination_hours | number ≥ 0 | Your calibration | Yes |
| incident_hours | number ≥ 0 | Your calibration | Yes |
| loaded_cost_per_hour | number ≥ 0 | Your calibration | Yes |
| period_weeks | number > 0 | Your calibration | Yes |
| recoverable_fraction | number ≥ 0, ≤ 1 | Your calibration | Optional |
| rework_hours | number ≥ 0 | Your calibration | Yes |
| unplanned_hours | number ≥ 0 | Your calibration | Yes |
{
"available_hours": 1600,
"coordination_hours": 140,
"incident_hours": 50,
"loaded_cost_per_hour": 95,
"period_weeks": 4,
"recoverable_fraction": 0.25,
"rework_hours": 90,
"unplanned_hours": 120
} What you get back
This is the actual output of running the example above — computed by the same function the platform calls, not an illustration.
{
"annualized_cost": 494000,
"breakdown": [
{
"category": "coordination",
"cost": 13300,
"hours": 140,
"share_of_available": 0.0875
},
{
"category": "unplanned",
"cost": 11400,
"hours": 120,
"share_of_available": 0.075
},
{
"category": "rework",
"cost": 8550,
"hours": 90,
"share_of_available": 0.0563
},
{
"category": "incident",
"cost": 4750,
"hours": 50,
"share_of_available": 0.0312
}
],
"equivalent_fte": 2.5,
"focus_hours": 1200,
"hidden_hours": 400,
"hidden_work_tax": 0.25,
"interpretation": "Team-level capacity leakage; do not use this output to rank individuals.",
"method": "hidden_work_tax_v1",
"period_cost": 38000,
"recovery_scenario": {
"cost": 9500,
"equivalent_fte": 0.62,
"hours": 100,
"recoverable_fraction": 0.25
}
} How it works
Decision analysis — Turn uncertainty, cost and risk appetite into a defensible choice, with the reasoning left inspectable.
- 1 Translate unplanned work, rework, incidents, and coordination into capacity and cost leakage.
- 2 Evaluate the method-specific diagnostics and gates returned by the function, then abstain unless the declared decision clears them under locally governed thresholds.
Before you trust it
Every tool in the catalog ships with the conditions under which its answer is meaningful — and the conditions under which it should abstain instead of guessing.
Assumptions & guardrails
- Actions, outcomes, utilities, evidence boundaries, uncertainty representation, and accountable ownership match the actual decision.
- The result structures a governed choice; it does not replace accountable judgment or authorize action outside the declared decision boundary.
Minimum evidence
- available_hours: required and organization-defined
- unplanned_hours: required and organization-defined
- rework_hours: required and organization-defined
- incident_hours: required and organization-defined
- coordination_hours: required and organization-defined
- loaded_cost_per_hour: required and organization-defined
- period_weeks: required and organization-defined
How to validate it
Validate on future periods or held-out aggregate units, compare with a simple baseline, and require stability across plausible metric definitions and decision thresholds.
Calibrating it to your org
Same for everyone
The mathematical kernel, validation rules, method version, and JSON output semantics are organization-independent; no tenant-trained coefficients or company benchmark is embedded in the function.
Specific to you
- metric/outcome definitions, entity grain, observation window, costs, thresholds, priors, and constraints represented by the function inputs
Calibration workflow
- 1 Define the management decision, target outcome, aggregate unit, privacy boundary, cadence, and prediction/intervention horizon for this organization.
- 2 Build a tenant-scoped historical cohort using only information available before each prediction or decision; preserve zero periods, censoring, assignment probabilities, and unresolved outcomes when the method requires them.
- 3 Estimate statistical parameters on training history, but obtain costs, utilities, risk tolerance, practical-effect thresholds, capacity, and policy constraints from accountable decision owners.
- 4 Validate on later time windows or held-out aggregate units at the deployment grain, against a simple baseline and the function-specific validation strategy.
- 5 Deploy only if the returned decision clears evidence, overlap, calibration, robustness, and guardrail checks; warning, unsupported, schema-gap, and fallback decisions are abstentions.
- 6 Monitor realized outcomes, data drift, coverage, and decision regret; recalibrate at a governed cadence or after a detected regime/definition change, never merely because a stakeholder dislikes the result.
Call it from your AI
You don't wire up 388 tools in your MCP client. The GitRevio MCP server exposes 18 tools, three of which let an agent search the catalog, read a tool's schema, and run it — so the assistant finds this one on its own.
gitrevio_capabilities_search
{ "q": "translate unplanned work rework incidents and" }
→ finds "calculate_hidden_work_tax"
gitrevio_capability_describe
{ "capability_id": "calculate_hidden_work_tax" }
→ returns the input schema and agent guidance shown on this page
gitrevio_capability_run
{ "capability_id": "calculate_hidden_work_tax", "arguments": { ... } }
→ returns the result shown above Works in Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Continue.dev, Goose and Aider. See the MCP server.
Related tools
Calculate engineering runway
Compare three-point roadmap effort with three-point team capacity and expose unfunded commitments.
Score investor execution vitals
Give startup investors an evidence-shrunk execution signal spanning milestones, runway, reliability, and resilience.
Allocate attention budget
Use exact knapsack optimization to allocate limited expert-review time by expected avoided loss.
Allocate capacity by marginal value
Allocate indivisible aggregate capacity across initiative-specific diminishing marginal-value scenario curves, activation thresholds, hard minimum commitments, unit cost, and portfolio CVaR with discrete next-unit value and explicit solver certainty.
Allocate capacity nash bargaining
Allocate discrete shared capacity by weighted Nash social welfare over concave team utility curves, with disagreement guarantees and a utilitarian counterfactual.
Calculate shadow price of capacity
Calculate lumpy, discrete capacity shadow prices by re-optimizing a scenario-valued initiative portfolio after a governed increment to each resource, with CVaR penalty and explicit exact or heuristic solver status.